Gwyneth Paltrow

A jury in Utah has found Oscar-winning actor Gwyneth Paltrow was not responsible for injuries sustained by a man during a ski slope collision at an upscale ...

The jury determined that Paltrow was not at fault and said that Sanderson was at fault "100 percent". The jury awarded Paltrow the $1 in symbolic damages that she had asked for in a countersuit. Paltrow said she did not cause the accident and that it was Sanderson who struck her from behind.

Gwyneth Paltrow has won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided that the actor wasn't at fault for the ...

The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. The retired optometrist has said the collision left him with a concussion and four broken ribs. The eight-person jury is tasked with weighing dueling versions of who was the downhill skier, making the other side culpable according to a skier responsibility code.

The decision comes after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that drew worldwide audiences.

Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him. The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Terry Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than US$300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Paltrow is also known for her roles in Shakespeare in Love and the Iron Man movies.

Paltrow, an actor who has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read ...

Paltrow’s defense team tried to paint Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. [Sundance Film Festival,](https://apnews.com/hub/sundance-film-festival) where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him. The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Terry Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than $300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television.

The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed ...

During closing arguments he told jurors that Paltrow had decided to take a stand in fighting Sanderson's case. "You lose everybody — your family, they'll put up with you, and maybe the lawyers. "Part of Terry will forever be on the Bandara run," Sykes told the jury. "All I saw was a whole lot of snow. The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed into him. As a result, he said, he suffered four broken ribs and lifelong brain damage.

Gwyneth Paltrow has won her ski crash trial. The US actress, 50, was accused in a lawsuit of crashing into fellow skier Terry Sanderson, 76, during a 2016 ...

And then there was a body pressing against me. Paltrow, who has been present in court each day of the trial, will not be making a statement. Reports suggest she said, “I wish you well.” “I just remember everything was great and then I heard something I’ve never heard at a ski resort and that was a blood-curdling scream,” he said. After Paltrow’s testimony, Sanderson then took to the stand with a different version of events, saying he was hit in the back, which caused him to crash land. She was then caught on camera on her way out of the courthouse, where she leaned into her accuser and shared parting words with him.

The eight-person jury is tasked with weighing duelling versions of who was skiing downhill, making the other side culpable according to a skier ...

They've nodded along as lawyers and witnesses have referenced local landmarks like Montage Deer Valley, the ski-side hotel-spa where Paltrow got a massage after the collision. Among the most bombshell testimony has been from Paltrow and Sanderson. Though they've tapped into themes including the power of fame throughout the trial, they said that the case ultimately wasn't about celebrity, but simply damages. In a courtroom more packed today than any other day of the trial, Sanderson's attorneys delivered their arguments first. The retired optometrist has said the collision left him with a concussion and four broken ribs. The eight-person jury is tasked with weighing duelling versions of who was the downhill skier, making the other side culpable according to a skier responsibility code.

Paltrow had four words for the man who blamed her for the 2016 collision at a Utah ski resort.

Paltrow’s defence team represented Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. In response, Paltrow countersued for US$1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him. Paltrow is also known for her roles in Shakespeare in Love and the Iron Man movies. The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

Gwyneth Paltrow has won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided that the actor wasn't at fault for the ...

Ms Swift was awarded $1 in 2017. They argued that Ms Paltrow was not at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Mr Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries. Ms Paltrow is also known for her roles in Shakespeare in Love and the Iron Man movies. When the judge read the eight-member jury's verdict in the Park City courtroom, Ms Paltrow looked to her attorneys with a pursed smile. Ms Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist the collision was not her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt "a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise". - When the judge read the eight-member jury's verdict Ms Paltrow looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile

It might be just a skiing accident, but the legal fight between A-lister Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist, ...

Sanderson claimed he was skiing down the right side of the run when he heard “a blood-curdling scream … “Gwyneth Paltrow looks like she’s on trial in 1987 for hiring a hitman to kill her husband,” read one widely circulated tweet. Paltrow said that rather than return to the slopes, she scheduled a massage.

The Hollywood star turned luxury wellness guru not only convinced the jury but won plaudits for her poise and look.

[“Articles of Interest”](https://open.spotify.com/show/6XKe8xy5P16OLrkBW9oz0k) podcast – says Paltrow’s style does show a lot of care. Paltrow also endorsed “stealth wealth” – clothes that are expensive but do not overtly advertise it, don’t follow TikTok trends, and rely on subtler gestures and context. Her message, especially to working mothers like her was an empowering: “That bitch will get things done.” As indeed she did in the Utah courtroom. “It’s actually been enhanced because of how she handled herself with poise.” Paltrow’s victory will probably play to fans and detractors equally, with each finding reasons to firm up their original views of the Goop merchandiser. “What we’ve been seeing is essentially Gwyneth Paltrow’s greatest hits,” says Bob Thompson, professor of media studies at Syracuse University.

All for a buck? Nah, Gwyneth Paltrow's motivation to go to trial over ski collision was about vindication.

[Paltrow](https://apnews.com/article/gwyneth-paltrow-utah-ski-collision-trial-3f3b25539799e4537f2157ee3679d202) her height and she responded “just under 5'10”," VanOrman replied, “I am so jealous! Paltrow was awarded the $1 she requested in her counter-suit, a symbolic amount that mirrored Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Many now identify her more with her wellness-and-lifestyle company [Goop, whose offerings have brought her ridicule](https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-business-health-arts-and-entertainment-celebrity-1028157cbc144be7941466cf4aad8ef5) in some quarters as the quintessential out-of-touch peddler of celebrity woo-woo. "The jury sees that and thinks she must not be that bad if the opposing attorney likes her. As he waited to be tobogganed down the mountain by ski patrol, she followed her children Moses and Apple down the mountain, testifying that she was accustomed to having things done for her. “You can have that and people are going to know it and accept. She’s always in the spotlight, so she always has to be honest.” “It’s not often that you go through the whole expense and time and bother of litigation for a dollar,” said Tre Lovell, a Los Angeles lawyer who handles many celebrity cases. “I didn’t see this being a downfall for her,” Baird said. “I think, you know, there was in the back of my mind, ‘Yes, this woman’s an actress,’ and you know, I took that into account," Imrie said. And it actually came across that she had empathy for what this plaintiff has gone through.” As a court reporter read the verdict, the courtroom gallery made up mostly of her supporters exhaled while Paltrow sat next to her lawyer intently and avoided displaying emotion that could be interpreted as surprise or gloating.

A juror in the Gwyneth Paltrow ski accident trial speaks out for the first time on why the Oscar-winning actor won the case.

This is based on the evidence and this is based on the law. Sanderson was seen traveling the world and in seemingly good health. “I think I wrote down something like, ‘I need to make more money so I can travel this way,'” Imrie said. She’s always in the spotlight so she always has to be honest.” “He’s a snow sports expert in many different ways,” Imrie said. [Gwyneth Paltrow](https://variety.com/t/gwyneth-paltrow/) ski accident trial opened up to ABC News about the jury’s unanimous decision in favor of the Oscar-winning actor.

Having now ended in her victory, the star's trial over a ski crash has had the world rapt. It's all to do with her particular brand of unworldly celebrity, ...

["dangerous"](https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/gwyneth-paltrow-sparks-concern-podcast-diet-promotion-bone-broth-eating-disorder-b1067696.html). Her avatar of privileged white womanhood – inconceivably wealthy, hyper-fixated on things that most have never thought about (vaginal steamers, anyone?) – is a curious mixture of generational influence. These accessories all added to the drama, and as Twitter took serious delight in pointing out, she looked like nothing more or less than a woman on trial for ski-related crimes. And in today's relentlessly critical social media discourse, many find her schtick so over-the-top that they can't help but find it entertaining. There is something so absurd about Paltrow's image that it seems almost to transcend the disdain you might expect to be levelled at her for such flagrant unworldliness. Even her exceptionally trim body, at 50, is another part of the brand: recently, she has spoken about a bone-broth diet which has been widely criticised as What followed were eight frankly bizarre days of proceedings, featuring a phalanx of doctors, physicists (yes, really), and a defence attorney who repeatedly complimented Paltrow on her fashion sense and questioned her about her friendship with Taylor Swift. How to explain the sheer level of interest in the case? Before conscious uncoupling, her wellness brand Goop, or a child named Apple – never mind the public hoopla of a court case which naturally had to involve the most privileged of rich-person-accidents, a skiing collision – Gwyneth Paltrow was just a plain old movie star. [memes](https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/03/29/gwyneth-paltrows-skiing-trial-is-the-white-lotus-on-steroids/) of her testimony in the witness box that spread around the internet and platforms such as TikTok. And yesterday afternoon in the courtroom in Park City, Utah, (She subsequently [insisted ](https://www.insider.com/gwyneth-paltrow-defends-diet-after-facing-criticism-online-2023-3)that she has many days of eating "whatever" and "french fries".)

The 50-year-old actress was sued by Terry Sanderson for NZ$480,000 over a 2016 collision at Utah's Deer Valley Resort, while she countersued for costs plus ...

Attorney Steve Owens said: "We are pleased with this unanimous outcome and appreciate the judge and jury's thoughtful handling of the case. "I am pleased with the outcome and I appreciate all of the hard work of Judge Holmberg and the jury, and thank them for their thoughtfulness in handling this case." Gwyneth Paltrow is "pleased with the outcome" of her ski crash trial.

A juror on the Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial has revealed why the star won her case.

“I wouldn’t have thought he was capable of those things based on the picture that had been painted,” she said. However, a judge decided the optometrist was only eligible for $US300,000 (NZ$479,000) if he won the case against the celebrity. “I work in medicine, and you have to look at everyone the same. The accident was ruled to be 100 per cent Sanderson’s fault. “She’s always in the spotlight, so she always has to be honest.” This is based on the law,” she said. I mean, this is based on the evidence. “He’s a snow sports expert in many different ways. However, she ultimately found Paltrow’s testimony to be extremely dependable and honest, according to the New York Post. So I think that that should apply in the courtroom as well,” she said. “The whole thing was a little shocking to me,” she said, adding that her background as a nurse helped her reach the decision. “He was telling his truth, and I think unfortunately, some of that has been distorted due to some other factors, but I do think he did not intend to tell a truth that wasn’t his truth,” she said.