Discover why the Fantastic Beasts franchise fell short of Harry Potter's success and the key protagonist issue.
The magical world of J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series captivated audiences worldwide with its intricate plotlines and beloved characters. However, when the Fantastic Beasts franchise was launched, it failed to replicate the same level of success. One of the main reasons for this disparity was the lack of a truly relatable protagonist. Newt Scamander, while endearing in his own right, lacked the universal appeal that Harry Potter's character embodied. The audience struggled to connect with Newt on the same emotional level, hindering the franchise's ability to capture hearts as effectively as the original series.
Despite the visually stunning settings and captivating creatures introduced in the Fantastic Beasts films, the absence of a character as universally loved as Harry Potter himself was a crucial factor in its underperformance. The intricate details of the magical creatures and the expansion of the wizarding world were not enough to compensate for the missing emotional connection with the protagonist. The franchise fell short in establishing the same level of deep emotional investment that fans had with Harry, Ron, and Hermione.
It's essential for a successful franchise to not only present a rich, fantastical world but also to anchor it with a protagonist who resonates with audiences on a personal level. Harry Potter's journey from the boy under the stairs to the savior of the wizarding world struck a chord with readers and viewers worldwide, creating a lasting impact. Newt Scamander, although a fascinating character in his own right, couldn't replicate that same emotional depth and universal appeal.
In the realm of magical storytelling, the legacy of Harry Potter's character dynamics and profound impact on readers and viewers remains unmatched. The franchise's ability to create a profound emotional connection with its audience set a high bar for subsequent magical tales. While Fantastic Beasts introduced new wonders and adventures, it struggled to evoke the same level of emotional attachment that made Harry Potter a timeless classic.
The Fantastic Beasts franchise wasn't as successful as the eight Harry Potter original films. · Newt Scamander was not a relatable enough protagonist to carry ...